institution’s powers to take remedial action.
The judges are about to arrive.
While we wait, the parties involved in the Constitutional Court matter regarding President Jacob Zuma's Nkandla home did not reach a settlement with Jacob Zuma on Friday over the matter.
The court had given them until 16:00 on Friday to respond to a settlement proposed by Zuma on Tuesday.
The EFF had proposed its own order which it wanted the Constitutional Court to hand down.The party wanted the court to confirm that the public protector's power to take remedial action included the power to issue directions binding on organs of state, according to a copy of the order.
It wanted directions given in her March 2014 report, "Secure in Comfort", to remain binding on Zuma.
This included paying a reasonable percentage of the cost of non-security upgrades.
Back inside the Concourt...
Advocates Dali Mpofu and Wim Trengrove are also seen from the gallery.
Picture by News24's Genevieve Quintal.
Picture by Genevieve Quintal, News24.
News24's Genevieve Quintal, Naledi Shange and Wim Pretorius are at the Constitutional Court in Johannesburg to cover the case.
Picture by Genevieve Quintal.
The Economic Freedom Fighters and DA want the court to compel Zuma to implement Public Protector Thuli Madonsela's recommendations and repay a reasonable part of the R246m spent on so-called security upgrades to his Nkandla, KwaZulu-Natal homestead.
On Tuesday morning, EFF leader Julius Malema would lead a "pay back the money" march starting at Mary Fitzgerald Square in Newtown, and ending at the Constitutional Court, ahead of the hearing.
The EFF, DA, and the public protector, want the court to clarify the nature and extent of the chapter nine institution’s powers to take remedial action.
Legal certainty about the public protector’s powers was vital to a successful constitutional democracy, Democratic Alliance federal executive chairperson James Selfe said.